Monday, December 27, 2010

A Christmas-day Sermon

A Christmas-day Sermon

By Samuel Davies, December 25, 1760


"And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host, praising God, and saying: Glory to God in the highest, and on earth, peace, good-will towards men!" Luke 2:13, 14

This is the day which the church of Rome, and some other churches that deserve to be placed in better company, have agreed to celebrate in memory of the Prince of Peace, the Savior of men, the incarnate God, Immanuel. And I doubt not—but many convert superstition into rational and Scriptural devotion, and piously employ themselves in a manner acceptable to God, though they lack the sanction of divine authority for appropriating this day to a sacred use.

But, alas! it is generally a season of sinning, sensuality, luxury, and various forms of extravagance; as though men were not celebrating the birth of the holy Jesus—but of Venus—the goddess of sex, or Bacchus—the god of wine—whose most sacred rites were mysteries of iniquity and debauchery!

The birth of Jesus was solemnized by hosts of angels; they had their music and their songs on this occasion. But how different from those generally used among mortals! "Glory to God in the highest, on earth, peace, good will to men!" This was their song. But is the music and dancing, the feasting and rioting, the idle songs and extravagant mirth of mortals at this season—a proper echo or response to this angelic song? I leave you to your own reflections upon this subject, after I have given the hint; and I am sure, if they are natural and pertinent, and have a proper influence upon you, they will restrain you from running into the fashionable excesses of riot on this occasion.

To remember and piously improve the incarnation of our divine Redeemer, to join the concert of angels, and dwell in ecstatic meditation upon their song—this is lawful, this is a seasonable duty every day; and consequently upon this day as well. And as Jesus improved the feast of dedication, though not of divine institution, as a proper opportunity to exercise his ministry, when crowds of the Jews were gathered from all parts—so I would improve this day for your instruction, since it is the custom of our country to spend it religiously, or idly, or wickedly—as different people are differently disposed.

But as the seeds of superstition which have sometimes grown up to a prodigious height, have been frequently sown and cherished by very inconsiderable incidents, I think it proper to inform you, that I may guard against this danger, that I do not set apart this day for public worship, as though it had any peculiar sanctity, or we were under any obligations to keep it religiously. I know no human authority, which has power to make one day more holy than another, or that can bind the conscience in such cases. Special days, consecrated by the mistaken piety or superstition of men, and conveyed down to us as holy, through the corrupt medium of human tradition, I think myself free to observe them or not, according to convenience, and the prospect of usefulness; like other common days, on which I may lawfully carry on public worship or not, as circumstances require. And since I have so fair an opportunity, and it seems necessary in order to prevent my conduct from being a confirmation of present superstition, or a temptation to future, I shall, once for all, declare my sentiments more fully upon this head.

But I must premise, that it is far from my design, to widen the differences existing among Christians, to embitter their hearts against each other, or to awaken dormant controversies concerning the non-essentials of religion. And if this use should be made of what I shall say, it will be an unnatural perversion of my design.

I would make every candid concession in favor of those who observe days of human institution, that can consist with truth and my own liberty. I grant, that so many plausible things may be offered for the practice as may have the appearance of solid argument, even to honest inquirers after truth. I grant, that I doubt not but many are offering up acceptable devotion to God on this day; devotion proceeding from honest, believing hearts, and therefore acceptable to him on any day—acceptable to him, notwithstanding their little mistake in this affair.

I grant, we should, in this case, imitate the generous candor and forbearance of Paul, in a similar case.

The converts to Christianity from among the Jews, long retained the prejudices of their education, and thought they were still obliged, even under the gospel dispensation, to observe the rites and ceremonies of the law of Moses, to which they had been accustomed, and particularly those days which were appointed by God to be religiously kept under the Jewish dispensation.

The Gentile converts, on the other hand, who were free from these early prejudices of education and custom, and had imbibed more just notions of Christian liberty, looked upon these Jewish holy-days as common days, and no longer to be observed. This occasioned a warm dispute between these two classes of converts, and Paul interposes, not so properly to determine which party was right, (that was comparatively a small matter,) as to bring both parties to exercise moderation and forbearance towards each other, and to put a charitable construction upon their different practices in these minor articles; and particularly to believe concerning each other, that though their practices were different—yet the principle from which they acted was the same, namely, a sincere desire to glorify and please God, and a conscientious regard to what they apprehended was his will.

"Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters. One man considers one day more sacred than another; another man considers every day alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind. He who regards one day as special, does so to the Lord." Romans 14:1, 5, 6. That is, it is a conscientious regard to the Lord, which is the principle upon which both parties act, though they act differently in this matter. Therefore, says the apostle, "You, then, why do you judge your brother? Or why do you look down on your brother? For we will all stand before God's judgment seat?" That is, why do you severely censure him for practicing differently in this minor affair?

"So whatever you believe about these things" says he, have you a full persuasion of what is right in these punctilios and ceremonials. Then, "keep between yourself and God;" verse 22. Keep it to yourself as a rule for your own practice—but do not impose it upon others, nor disturb the church of Christ about it. It befits us, my friends, to imitate this toleration and charity of the apostle, in these minor differences; and God forbid I should tempt any of you to forsake so noble an example.

But then the example of the same apostle will authorize us modestly to propose our own sentiments and the reasons of our practice, and to warn people from laying a great stress upon ceremonials and superstitious observances. This he does particularly to the Galatians, who not only kept the Jewish holy-days—but placed a great part of their religion in the observance of them. "You observe days, and months, and times, and years;" therefore, says he, "I am afraid for you, lest I have bestowed upon you labor in vain." Galatians 4:10, 11.

The commandments of God have often been made void by the traditions of men; and human inventions have often been more religiously observed than divine institutions! And when this was the case, Paul was warm in opposing even ceremonial mistakes.

Having premised this, which I look upon as much more important than the decision of the question, I proceed to show you the reasons why I would not religiously observe days of human appointment, in commemoration of Christ and the saints. What I have to say shall be particularly pointed at what is called Christmas-day: but may be easily applied to all other holy-days instituted by men.

The first reason I shall offer is—that I would take my religion just as I find it in my Bible—without any imaginary improvements or supplements of human invention. All the ordinances which God has been pleased to appoint, I would honestly endeavor to observe in the most sacred manner. But when ignorant presuming mortals take upon themselves to improve upon Divine institutions, to make that a part of religion, which God has left indifferent; in short, when they would mingle something of their own—with the pure religion of the Bible—then I must be excused from obedience, and beg permission to content myself with the old, plain, simple religion of the Bible. Now that there is not the least appearance in all the Bible—of the Divine appointment of Christmas, to celebrate the birth of Christ—is granted by all parties; and the Divine authority is not so much as pretended for it. Therefore, a Bible-Christian is not at all bound to observe it.

Secondly, the Christian church, for at least three hundred years, did not observe any day in commemoration of the birth of Christ. For this we have the testimony of the primitive fathers themselves. Thus Clemens Alexandrinus, who lived about the year one hundred and ninety-four, "We are commanded to worship and honor him, who, we are persuaded, is the Word, and our Savior and Ruler, and through him, the Father; not upon certain particular or select days, as some others do—but constantly practicing this all our life, and in every proper way."

Chrysostom, who lived in the fourth century, has these words, "It is not yet ten years, since this day, that is, Christmas, was plainly known to us;" and he observes, the custom was brought to Constantinople from Rome. Now since this day was not religiously observed in the church in the first and purest ages—but was introduced as superstitions increased, and Christianity began to degenerate very fast into popery; ought not we to imitate the purity of these primitive times, and retain none of the superstitious observances of more corrupt ages!

Thirdly, if a day should be religiously observed in memory of the birth of Christ, it ought to be that day on which he was born. But that day, and even the month and the year, are altogether uncertain. The Scriptures do not determine this point of chronology. And perhaps they are silent on purpose—to prevent all temptation to the superstitious observance of it; just as the body of Moses was secretly buried, and his grave concealed—to guard the Israelites from the danger of idolizing it.

Chronologers are also divided upon the point: and even the ancients are not agreed. The learned generally suppose that Christ was born two or three years before the common reckoning. And as to the month, some suppose it was in September, and some in June. And they imagine it was very unlikely, that he was born in the cold wintry months of December, because we read, that at the time of his birth, shepherds were out in the field, watching their flocks by night; which is not probable at that season of the year.

The Christian epoch, or reckoning time from the birth of Christ, was not introduced until about the year five hundred; and it was not generally used until the reign of Charles the Great, about the year eight hundred, or a little above nine hundred years ago. And this must occasion a great uncertainty, both as to the year, month, and day. But why do I dwell so long upon this? It must be universally confessed, that the day of his birth is quite uncertain. Nay, it is certain that it is not that which has been kept in commemoration of it.

To convince you of this, I need only put you in mind of the late parliamentary correction of our computation of time by introducing the new-style; by which Christmas is eleven days sooner than it was accustomed to be. And yet this chronological blunder still continues in the public prayers of some, who give thanks to God, that Christ was born as upon this day. And while this prayer was offered up in England and Virginia on the twenty-fifth of December old-style, other countries that followed the new-style, were solemnly declaring in their thanksgivings to God, that Christ was born eleven days sooner! That is, on the fourteenth of December. I therefore conclude, that neither this day or any other was ever intended to be observed for this purpose.

Finally, superstition is a very growing evil; and therefore the first beginnings of it ought to be prevented. Many things that were at first introduced with a pious design, have grown up gradually into the most enormous superstition and idolatry in after ages! The ancient Christians, for example, had such a veneration for the pious martyrs, that they preserved a lock of hair, or some little memorial of them; and this laid the foundation for the expensive sale and stupid idolizing of the relics of the saints in popish countries!

They also celebrated their memory, by observing the days of their martyrdom. But as the number of the martyrs and saints real or imaginary, increased, the saints' days also multiplied to an extravagant degree, and hardly left any days in the year for any other purpose! And as they had more saints than days in the year, they dedicated the first of November for them all, under the title of All-saints-day.

But if the saints must be thus honored, then certainly much more ought Jesus Christ. This seemed a natural inference: and accordingly, these superstitious devotees appointed one day to celebrate his birth, another his baptism, another his death, another the day of Pentecost, and an endless list that I have not time now to mention.

The apostles also must be put into the calendar: and thus almost all the days in the year were consecrated by superstition, and hardly any left for the ordinary labors of life. Thus the people are taught to be idle the greatest part of their time, and so indisposed to labor on the few days that are still allowed them for that purpose. This has almost ruined some popish countries, particularly the Pope's dominions in the fine country of Italy, once the richest and best improved in the world.

Addison, Burnet, and other travelers, inform us—that everything bears the appearance of poverty, notwithstanding all the advantages of soil and climate: and that this is chiefly owing to the superstition of the people, who spend the most of their time as holy-days.

And if you look over the calendar of the church of England, you will find that the festivals in one year, amount to thirty-one. The fasts to no less than ninety-five, to which add the fifty-two Sundays in every year, and the whole will make one hundred and seventy-eight: so that only one hundred and eighty-seven days will be left in the whole year, for the common labors and purposes of life.

And whether the poor could procure a subsistence for themselves and their families by the labor of so few days, and whether it is not a yoke that neither we nor our fathers are able to bear—I leave you to judge.

It is true, that but very few of these feasts and fasts are now observed, even by the members of the established church. But then they are still in their calendar and Canons, and binding upon them by the authority of the church; and as far as they do not comply with them, so far they are dissenters: and in this, and in many other respects, they are generally dissenters, though they do not share with us in the infamy of the name.

Now, since the beginnings of superstitious inventions in the worship of God are so dangerous in their outcome, and may grow up into such enormous extravagance, we ought to shun the danger, by adhering to the simplicity of the Bible-religion, and not presume to make more days or things holy—than the all-wise God has been pleased to sanctify. He will be satisfied with the religious observance of his own institutions—and why should not we? It is certainly enough, that we are as religious as he requires us. And all our will-worship is liable to that confounding rejection, "Who has required this at your hands?" Isaiah 1:12.


I now proceed to what is more delightful and, profitable, the sublime anthem of the angels: "Glory to God in the highest! on earth, peace! good will to men!"

What a happy night was this to the poor shepherds, though exposed to the damps and darkness of midnight, and keeping their painful watches in the open field! An illustrious angel, clothed in light which kindled midnight into noon, came upon them, or suddenly hovered over them in the air, and the glory of the Lord, that is, a bright refulgent light, the usual emblem of his presence shone round about them. No wonder the poor shepherds were struck with horror, and overwhelmed at the sight of so glorious a phenomenon.

But when God strikes his people with terror, it is often an introduction to some signal blessing. And they are sometimes made sore afraid, like the shepherds, even with the displays of his glories. The first appearance even of the great deliverer, may seem like that of a great destroyer. But he will at length make himself known as he is—and allay the fears of his people. So the gentle angel cheers and supports the trembling shepherds, "Fear not," says he, you need not tremble—but rejoice at my appearance; "for behold" observe and wonder, "I bring you" from heaven, by order from its Sovereign, "good tidings of great joy," the best that was ever published in mortal ears—and not only to you, not only to a few private people or families, not only to the Jewish nation; but good tidings of great joy, "which shall be to all people" to Gentiles as well as Jews, to all nations, tribes, and languages—to all the various ranks of men—to kings and subjects—to rich and poor; to free and slave! Therefore let it circulate through the world, and resound from shore to shore!

And what is this news that is introduced with so sublime and transporting a preface? It is this: "For unto you is born this day in the city of David, a Savior, who is Christ the Lord!" Unto you mortals—unto you miserable sinners, is born a Savior—a Savior from sin and ruin! A Savior of no low or common character—but Christ, the promised Messiah, anointed with the Holy Spirit; and invested with the high office of Mediator! Christ the Lord, the Lord and ruler of heaven and earth, and universal nature! He is born—no longer represented by dark types and prophecies—but actually entered in the world—born this day! The long expected day has at length arrived; the prophecies are accomplished, and the fullness of time has come—born in the city of David—in Bethlehem, and therefore of the seed and lineage of David, according to the prophecies. Though he is a person of such eminence, Christ the Lord is now a feeble infant, just born. The Son born, and the Child given—he is the mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace." Isaiah 9:6.

The condescension of the angel, and the joyful tidings he brought, no doubt recovered the shepherds from their consternation, and emboldened them to lift up their faces. And how was their joy heightened, that they were chosen and appointed by Heaven, to be the first visitants to this new-born Prince! "This shall be a sign to you," said the angel, by which you may know this divine Infant from others.

What shall be the sign? Shall it be, that they will find him in a palace, surrounded with all the grandeur and majesty of courts, and attended by the emperors, kings and nobles of the earth; lying in a bed of down, and dressed in silks, and gold, and jewels? This might be expected—if we consider the dignity of his person. It would be infinite condescension for him to be born even in such circumstances as these. But these are not the characteristics of the incarnate God.

No! says the angel, This shall be a sign to you, "you shall find the babe, wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger!" Lying in a feeding-trough for animals! Luke 2:12. Astonishing! who could expect the new-born Son of God to be there? There, lying in straw, surrounded only with oxen and horses, and waited upon only by a feeble, solitary mother, far from home, among unkind, regardless strangers, who would not allow her room in the inn, even in her painful hour. Perhaps her poverty disabled her from bearing her expenses in the ordinary way; and therefore she must take up her lodging in a stable! In such circumstances of abasement did the Lord of glory enter our world!

In these circumstances he was "seen by angels" 1 Timothy 3:16; who were accustomed to behold him in another form—in all the glories of the heavenly world. And how strange a sight must this be! How bright a display of his love to the guilty sons of men!

The angel, who was the willing messenger of these glad tidings, did not descend from heaven alone. He appears to have been the commandant of an army of angels, that attended him on this grand occasion. For suddenly there was with him a multitude of the heavenly host, or, as it might be rendered, of soldiery of heaven. The angels are not a confused irregular body, or unconnected independent individuals; but a well-disposed system of beings, with proper subordinations; all marshaled into ranks under proper commanders. Hence they are called "thrones, and dominions, and principalities, and powers;" Col. 1:16.

We read of angels and archangels; 1 Thess. 4:16; of Michael and his angels; Revelation 12:7. They are called in the military style, the Lord's armies; Psalm 103:21, 148: 2; and the army of heaven; Daniel 4:35. Revelation 19:14; to signify the order established among them, and also their strength and unanimity to execute the commands of their sovereign, to repel the dragon and his angels, and defend the feeble heirs of salvation, on whom they condescend to wait.

Order and subordination is still retained even among the fallen angels in the kingdom of darkness. Hence we read of the prince of the devils; Matthew 9:34; the dragon and his angels; Revelation 12:7; legions of devils; Mark 5:9; which was a division of the Roman army, something like that of a regiment among us.

Now a regiment of the heavenly militia descended with their officer, to solemnize and publish the birth of their Lord, when he took upon him our nature. And no sooner had their commander delivered his message, than they immediately join with one voice, filling all the air with their heavenly music: "Praising God, and saying, glory to God in the highest! On earth, peace! good-will to men!" The language is abrupt, like that of a full heart: the sentences short, unconnected, and rapid; expressive of the ecstasy of their minds.

"Glory to God in the highest!" This deservedly leads the song. It is of more importance in itself, in the estimate of angels, and of all competent judges, than even the salvation of men. And the first and chief cause of joy and praise from the birth of a Savior is—that he shall bring glory to God. Through him, as a proper medium—the divine perfections shall shine forth with new, augmented splendor. Through him, sinners shall be saved in a way that will advance the honor of the divine perfections and government! Or if any of them perish—their punishment will more illustriously display the glory of their offended Sovereign.

The wisdom, grace, and mercy of God—are glorified in the contrivance of this scheme of redemption, and making millions of miserable creatures happy forever! His power is glorified, in carrying this scheme into execution, in spite of all opposition. His justice is glorified, in the atonement and satisfaction made for the sins of men by an incarnate Deity, and in the righteous and aggravated punishment executed upon those who obstinately reject this divine Savior, and who therefore perish without the least umbrage of excuse.

Oh! what wonders does Jehovah perform, in prosecution of this method of salvation! What wonders of pardoning mercy and sanctifying grace! What miracles of glory and blessedness does he form out of the dust, and the polluted fragments of human nature! What monuments of his own glorious perfections does he erect, through all the extensive regions of heaven! From these wonderful works of his—the glory of his own name breaks forth upon the worlds of angels and men, in one bright unclouded day, which shall never be obscured in night—but grow more and more illustrious through the endless ages of eternity!

Of this, the choir of angels were sensible at the birth of Christ; and therefore they shout aloud in ascriptions of glory to God. It was especially on this account, that they rejoiced in this great event. And all believers rejoice in it principally on this account too.

"Glory to God!" is the first note in the song of angels: and "hallowed be your name;" that is, let your name be sanctified, or glorified, is the first petition in the prayer of men. The glory of God should always be nearest our hearts—to this everything should give way; and we should rejoice in other things, and even in our own salvation, as they tend to promote this.

Such is the disposition of every godly man—his heart is enlarged, and extended beyond the narrow limits of self; he has a generous tender regard for the glory of the great God; and rejoices in the way of salvation through Christ, not merely as it makes him happy—but especially as it advances and displays the divine honor! This is his disposition, at least in some hours of refined, exalted devotion. Self is, as it were, swallowed up in God! And friends—is this your disposition?

"Glory to God in the highest!" In the highest. That is, in the highest strains. Let the songs of men and angels be raised to a higher key, on this great occasion. The usual strains of praise are low and languid, to celebrate the birth of this illustrious prince. This is a more glorious event than has ever yet happened in heaven or earth; and therefore demands a new song, more exalted and divine than has ever yet employed, even the voices of angels. At the birth of nature, the sons of God, the angels, sang together, and shouted for joy: but when the Author and Lord of nature is born, let them raise a loftier and a more ecstatic anthem of praise.

Or, "Glory to God in the highest" may signify—let glory be given to God in the highest heaven by all the choirs of angels. This celestial squadron call upon their fellow-angels, whom they left behind them in their native heaven, to echo to their song, and fill those blessed regions with the melody of new ascriptions of praise, as if they had said—though men receive the benefit, let all the angels of heaven join in the song of gratitude. Though men be silent, and refuse to celebrate the birth of their Savior and Lord; though earth does not echo with his praise, though more intimately concerned; let the heavenly inhabitants sound aloud their ascriptions of glory, and supply the guilty defect of ungrateful mortals.

Or finally, "Glory to God in the highest" may mean, glory to God who dwells in the highest heavens: glory to the high and lofty one, who inhabits eternity, and dwells in the high and holy place, Isaiah 57:15; and yet condescends to regard man that is a worm, Job 25:6, and sends his Son to assume his humble nature, to lie in a manger, and die upon a cross for him. Glory to God—for this astonishing condescension and grace!

The next article of this angelic song is, "Peace on earth!"

Peace to rebel man with his offended Sovereign;
peace with angels;
peace with conscience;
peace between man and man;
universal peace on earth, that region of discord and war.

Peace with God to rebel man. The illustrious Prince now born, comes to make up the breach, and reconcile sinners to their offended Sovereign. He is the great Peace-maker, who shall subdue the enmity of the carnal mind, and reduce the revolted sons of Adam to a willing subjection to their rightful Lord. He will bring thousands of disloyal hearts to love God above all, which were accustomed to love almost everything more than Him. He will reconcile them to the laws of his government, and the practice of universal obedience and holiness. He will set on foot a treaty of peace in the ministry of the gospel, and send out his ambassadors, to beseech the rebels in his stead, to be reconciled to God.

He will also reconcile God to man, by answering all the demands of his law and justice, paying the debts of insolvent sinners, and making amends for all their offences. He will appear as an all-prevailing advocate with his Father, in favor of a rebel world, and turn his heart to them again. So that this revolted province of his dominions, shall again become the object of his love, and he will look down and smile upon the obnoxious sons of men.

Oh happy peace! Oh blessed peace-maker! who puts an end to so fatal and unnatural a war, and brings the Creator and his creatures, the offended Sovereign and his rebellious subjects—into mutual friendship again, after the grand breach, that seemed likely never to be made up, and indeed never could be made up but by so great and powerful a Mediator; a Mediator of infinite dignity, merit and authority, able to remove all obstructions in the way of both parties.

The Peace proclaimed on this grand occasion may also imply, Peace with angels; peace between the inhabitants of heaven and earth. The angelic armies, the militia of heaven, are always upon the side of their Sovereign; always at war with his enemies, and ready to fight his battles. And upon the apostasy of our world they were ready to take up arms against the rebels. But now, when their Sovereign proclaims peace, they lay down their arms, they acquiesce in the peace, and receive the penitent, returning rebels with open arms. These benevolent beings rejoice in the restoration of their fellow-creature man, to the divine favor, and shout forth their songs of praise upon the publication of the news.

Again; this proclamation of peace may include peace with conscience. When man commenced an enemy to his Maker, he became an enemy to himself: his own conscience took up arms against him, and is perpetually fighting the cause of its Lord. But now the guilt of past sin may be washed away from the conscience with the pacific blood of Jesus, and all its clamors silenced by his all-satisfying righteousness. And now the peace will be preserved, and the contracting of new guilt prevented, by the sanctifying influence of the grace of this new-born Prince. His grace shall change disloyal hearts, and reform rebellious lives; and those shall enjoy the approbation of their conscience, who were accustomed to sweat and agonize under its tormenting accusations. Thus, self-tormenting sinners shall be reconciled to themselves; and peace in their own breasts shall be a perennial source of happiness: a happiness

"Which nothing earthly gives, nor can destroy,
The soul's calm sunshine, and the heartfelt joy."

Farther; peace on earth includes peace between man and man. Now the Prince of peace is born; and upon his appearance let animosity and discord, contentions and wars cease; and let universal harmony and benevolence prevail through the world. Let the bonds of love unite all the sons of Adam together in the closest friendship. It was love which constrained him to put on the nature of man, and to change his throne in heaven—for a manger! Love is the ruling passion of his soul; love is the doctrine he shall preach; love is the disposition he shall inspire; and love is the first principle of his religion.

Therefore, let all the world be melted and molded into love. Let the wolf and the lion put on the nature of the lamb; and let nothing hurt or destroy through all the earth. Let nation no more lift up sword against nation: let them beat their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning-hooks; and let them learn war no more. For of him it is foretold, that in his days abundance of peace shall flourish, so long as the moon endures. Psalm 72:7.

This, my friends, has already been accomplished in part: for peace and benevolence is the genius of Christianity; and wherever it has prevailed, it has introduced peace and harmony in families, in neighborhoods, and among nations. Nor can the present disturbed state of things, the animosities, quarrels and wars, that are in the world, disprove what I say: for these prevail only so far as the Christian spirit does not prevail. Just as much as there is of these among men, just so much of Christianity is lacking; just so far the genuine tendency of the birth of Jesus fails of its efficacy. However, we rejoice in the hope, that our world shall yet see better times, and experience the full effects of this illustrious birth: when the kingdom of the Prince of peace shall become universal, and diffuse peace among all nations. Oh! when shall that glorious revolution commence!

The next article in the song of angels is, "Good-will towards men." That is, the good-will and grace of God is now illustriously displayed towards men, sinful and unworthy as they are. And may they dutifully receive it, and enjoy all the happy effects of it!

Thus the angels declared, foretold, and wished. They declared that even then glory would redound to God, peace be established on earth, and the good-will and favor of God enjoyed by guilty men. And they foretold that thus it would be more and more to the end of time, and even through all eternity. And they also wished that these glorious effects might follow, as agreeable to the high regard they had for the divine honor, and their generous benevolence to their unworthy fellow-creatures, men.

This suggests a question, and also an answer to it. The question is, since the angels were not redeemed by Jesus Christ, and do not share in the benefits of redemption, as man does, why did they thus rejoice and sing at his birth? This we can account for from their regard to the glory of God, and their good-will to men.

Their happiness consists in the knowledge and love of God: and the more he displays his perfections in his works, the more they know of him, and consequently the more they love him. Now the redemption of sinners through Jesus Christ gives the most upright and amiable view of the divine perfections: and on this account the inhabitants of heaven rejoice in it. They know more of God from this great event—than from all his other works of creation and providence.

Hence Peter represents them as bending and looking with eager eyes, to pry into this mystery. Paul also intimates, that the founding of a church in our guilty world, and particularly the gathering of the poor outcast Gentiles into it, was a secret even to the angels, until revealed by the event; and that the revelation of it revealed to them more of the wisdom of God, than they ever knew before. "This," says he, "was a mystery, which from the beginning of the world was hid in God;" but it is now revealed, "to the intent that unto principalities and powers,"—to the various ranks of angels, "might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God." Ephesians 3:8, 10. This cleared up many of the dark events of Providence, which they could not before account for: and enabled them to see farther into the designs of divine wisdom.

Methinks when Abel, or the first saint from our world, arrived in heaven, the glorious natives of that country were struck with agreeable surprise, and wondered how he came there. They were ready to give up the whole race for lost, like their kindred angels that fell; and could contrive no possible method for their recovery. And how then are these earth-born strangers admitted into heaven? And when they found, by the proceedings of divine Providence, that God had gracious designs towards our world, and that these designs were to be accomplished by his Son, must they not be agreeably perplexed and bewildered to find out the manner in which he would accomplish them? In what way could he satisfy divine justice—who was himself the judge? How could he die for sin—who was all-immortal? These and the like difficulties must perplex the inquiries even of angels.

But now all is made plain; now the grand secret is disclosed. The Son of God—must become the son of man, must obey the law, and die upon the cross; and thus he was to accomplish the great design, and restore guilty man to the favor of God. Angels must rejoice at this discovery, as advancing the glory of God, and increasing their own happiness.

See how they bend! see how they look!
Long had they read the eternal book,
And studied dark decrees in vain:
The cross of Calvary makes them plain.
—Watts

Again: the angels are benevolent beings, and therefore rejoice at the birth of Christ, as tending to the salvation of poor sinners of the race of man. The Lord of angels tells us, "there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repents." Luke 15:10. And how much more must they rejoice to see the grand scheme disclosed, by which numerous colonies were to be transplanted from our guilty world to people the heavenly regions, and perhaps fill the vacant seats of the fallen angels!

I may add, it is not unlikely that the angels may receive some great advantages, to us unknown, by the mediation of Christ; though they do not need a mediator in the same sense that we do. But I have not time to enlarge upon this.

You now see the reasons of the joy of angels on this occasion: and it is no wonder they sung, "Glory to God in the highest, for peace proclaimed on earth, and goodwill towards men."

But how ought WE to improve this subject more immediately for our own advantage? This is our great concern; for we are personally interested in it, which the angels were not; at least, not in the same degree. Hence then,

We may learn HOW we ought to celebrate the birth of Christ—celebrate it like angels, not with balls and assemblies—not with reveling and carousing, and all the extravagances that are usual at this season; as if you were celebrating the birth of Venus or Bacchus, or some patron of iniquity; not with the sound of bells, muskets and cannons, and the other demonstrations of joy, upon occasions of a civil nature. Some of these are not innocent upon any occasion, and have a direct tendency to make men still more thoughtless, and giddy, and to prevent the blessed effects of this illustrious birth. Others of them, though lawful upon seasons of public national joy, for temporal blessings or deliverances—yet are impious and profane, when practiced in honor of the incarnation of the holy Jesus.

You will all grant, no doubt, that pious joy ought to be expressed in a pious manner; that the usual mirth, festivity, and gaiety of a birthday, in honor of our earthly sovereign, are not proper expressions of joy for the birth of a spiritual Savior—a Savior from this vain world—a Savior from sin and hell.

Therefore, I say, celebrate it as the angels did: giving glory to God in the highest, in your songs of praise; giving him glory by dwelling upon the wonders of redemption, in delightful meditation; by giving him your thoughts and affections; and by a life of devotion and universal obedience. Celebrate the birth of this great Prince of peace—by accepting that peace which angels proclaimed. Give a welcome reception to this glorious stranger. Do not turn him out of doors, as the Bethlemites did; but entertain him in your hearts. Let every faculty of your souls open to receive him. "Lift up your heads, O you gates; be lifted up, you ancient doors, that the King of glory may come in." (Psalm 24:7.) O let every heart cry, "Come in, you who are blessed by the LORD. Why are you standing out here?" (Genesis 24:31.)

He came to procure and restore peace between God and man; therefore I, his poor ambassador, "Beseech you in his stead—be reconciled to God." (2 Corinthians 5:20.) No longer continue in arms, rejecting his authority, trampling upon his laws, and refusing the offers of his grace: otherwise this peace will not extend to you; and war, eternal war, will continue between you and the omnipotent Lord God. But if the boldest rebel among you this day submits to his government, you shall enjoy the blessed peace, which angels proclaimed at his entrance into the world, and which he left as a legacy to his friends, when he was about to leave it. (John 14:27.)

Make peace also with your own conscience; and scorn to live at variance with yourselves. How ill do you take it, when others condemn you? and can you be easy, while perpetually condemning yourselves? Let conscience have full liberty to exercise its authority upon you, as Jehovah's deputy, and dare not to disobey its orders. Live in peace also with one another. Silence! you noisy brawlers: the Prince of Peace is born! Peace! be still! you contentious, angry passions: the Prince of peace is born! Away slander, backbiting, quarreling, envy, malice, revenge—away to your native hell: for the Prince of peace has entered into this world, and forbid you to appear upon it! Thus, friends, celebrate the birth of the Savior, and that not only upon this day—but every day through all your lives: and thus you may have a merry Christmas all the year round.

To CONCLUDE. What encouragement may this angelic proclamation afford to trembling, desponding penitents? "Fear not! for behold I bring you good tidings of great joy; for to you is born a Savior, Christ the Lord!" O! do not your hearts spring up within you at the news? I have somewhere heard of a crowd of criminals under condemnation, confined in one dungeon: and upon a messenger's arriving from their king, and proclaiming a pardon, they all rushed out so eagerly to receive the pardon, and see the publisher of the joyful news, that they trod and crushed one another to death. And shall there be no such pressing and crowding to Jesus Christ in this assembly today? Shall there be no such eagerness among us to receive a pardon from his hands? Alas! will any of you turn this greatest blessing of heaven—into a curse? Was it your destroyer who was born, when the angels sung the birth of a Savior? Indeed, if you continue to neglect him, you will find him such to you; and it would have been better for you, that neither you nor He had ever been born! Even the birth of the Prince of peace proclaims eternal war against you. I therefore now beseech you in his stead to be reconciled to him. Amen.

Christmas Traditions

Christmas Traditions



A Brief Study of the Origins of Modern Christmas Celebrations

by

Kathryn Capoccia

© Copyright Kathryn Capoccia 2002. This file may be freely copied, printed out, and distributed as long as copyright and source statements remain intact, and that it is not sold.

When December comes ‘round on the calendar we see decorated evergreen trees in homes, shop windows and town squares, buildings wreathed in evergreens and holly, neighborhoods and business areas bedecked with lights and ribbons and all manner of decorations. We hear carols playing on our radios and in our malls and workplaces. The malls are crowded with people. What time is it? Its Christmas time, the most popular holiday of the year, observed the world over as either a religious holiday or secular festival. This bustling season is associated with the birth of Christ, good cheer, family gatherings and feasts, gift giving, and Santa Claus. While most of us observe some type of Christmas traditions, how many of us know of their origins? For example, how many of us know why we call this season “Christmas?” Do we know why we celebrate it on the 25th of December? And why do we feast? Why do we cook the foods we do at Christmas? Why do we exchange gifts? What do wreaths and garlands of evergreens and holly have to do with it? Why have a Christmas tree? What is the significance of the Christmas lights that decorate our trees, homes and city streets? Who is Santa and how does he fit with the birth of Christ? For answers to these questions and more we must look to the past because Christmas is rooted in history, both in the pagan world and in ancient Christianity. For Christians it is especially important to know the origins and meanings of our traditions because we want to “worship in spirit and in truth” (JOH 4:23). With the exception, perhaps, of Easter, what historical event is more appropriate for us to extol than Christmas? Therefore, we need to look at our customs and determine whether they are valid expressions of our faith. Exodus 20:5, 34:14 and Isaiah 42:8 remind us that our God is a jealous God who will not give His glory to another; without knowing the truth we may, in ignorance, give glory to that which is idolatrous, honor lies, and perpetuate pagan rituals. We may offend God at a time when we are attempting to exalt His grace toward fallen man through the birth of His Son, the Savior, Our Lord Jesus Christ. Read and consider the following facts:

“Christmas” celebrations are foreign to the pages of Scripture: Biblically, “Christmas” does not exist. There is no account of Christians gathering to celebrate the birth of Christ to be found anywhere in the New Testament. Even the wise men of Matthew’s account, who came in response to the appearance of His birth star in the sky, did not celebrate together about His birth (MAT 2:1-13); they traveled from their own country bearing gifts in order to worship the child (and the Scriptures indicate that this occurred long after Jesus was born—his family was living in a house, not a stable, and Jesus could have been as old as two years of age). Christians did not begin to celebrate the birth of Christ until the 2nd century AD. The Roman Catholic Church did not begin its “Feast of the Nativity” until AD 336.

Even the word “Christmas” itself is not Biblical: it comes from 4th century AD Roman Catholicism. The “mas” of Christmas comes from the Mass, or Eucharistic service of western Catholicism. That rite was concluded with the words, “Ite, Missa Est” (“Go, as it is ended”), with Missa (dismissal) eventually becoming the name of the rite itself. The Old English word, “Christmas” dates from 1050 AD; it was derived from the phrase, “Christes Maesse,” or “Mass of Christ.” “Xmas” is a 13th century form of shorthand representing the full word “Christmas” (“X” is the Greek abbreviation, chi, from Khristos, Christ). The word, “Christmas,” did not find full usage until the 9th century AD.

December 25th is not the true birth date of Christ. This day was apparently chosen to coincide with pagan mid-winter festivals in order to unify pagan and Christian worship celebrations within the Roman Empire. The Empire encompassed a vast territory encircling the Mediterranean Sea, stretching from Europe (England, Ireland, Spain, France, southern Germany, Italy, Sicily, Austria, Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Albania, Macedonia, Greece), to Asia Minor (southern Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkey, Crete), to the Middle East (Syria, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Palestine, Lebanon, Israel), and to Africa (northern Egypt and the Nile Valley, northern Libya, Tunisia, northern Algeria, Morocco). The mystery religions of the Near East, India and Egypt had been spread to Europe by the Roman legions, and the Norse, Teutonic, and Celtic beliefs had spread eastward by the same means, so that various religious festivals were observed throughout the Empire at the same time.

December was an exceptionally important religious month. In Egypt, December 21st marked the date of the celebration of the death and resurrection of Osiris, the god of the underworld and judge of the dead, the husband of Isis. The end of the month saw the observance of the birthday (Dec. 26th) of Horus, son of Isis, the sun god and proto-type of human rulers, with a twelve-day festival conspicuous for its decorations of palms with twelve shoots (for the twelve months of the year). In northern Europe the Norse held a twelve-day feast of the solstice at the end of December. Jews throughout the Empire observed Hanukkah, or “the feast of lights” during December. Greeks worshipped Apollo, Attis, Dionysus, Helios, Herakles, Perseus, and Theseus in December. December also encompassed the celebration of the Roman Saturnalia, or “Saturn (god of the grain harvest) Festival,” a seven-day fair and festival of the home which began on December 17th (Saturn’s birthday) and ran through the 23rd. It was an emotional time of feasting open to everyone, celebrated with the exchange of gifts, merry-making, and decorating with boughs of laurel and evergreens. Lamps and candles burned continually, and a feeling of “goodwill” towards man prevailed. Schools were closed, the army was “at ease,” slaves were let off their duties and allowed to “supplant” their masters, friends visited each other, processions of people danced through the streets in masks, hats or blackened faces—there was a Lord of Misrule who presided over the festival—and each household chose a mock king to preside over the festivities. Another popular holiday on the Roman calendar, Kalendae or Kalends (literally, “the first of the month”), or “New Year’s Day,” was only a few days beyond the Saturnalia. Kalends was dedicated to the two-headed god, Janus, who looked forward to the future and backward to the past. It was celebrated with a feast, garlands of evergreens and the exchanging of small gifts, particularly of lamps with which to light one’s path into the future. December 25th, the winter solstice by the Julian calendar, the day of the least sunlight of the year, was the day on which day many sun-worshiping pagans worshiped the sun (lest the sunlight should disappear altogether); they also held festivals shortly thereafter in gratitude for lengthening days. This date, December 25th, had early been identified with both the Persian sun-god, Mithras, the god of light, truth and righteousness (represented by a bull) and the Syrian god, Sol Invictus, (the unconquered sun)—celebrated with feasting, masquerades, a relaxation of order and temporary role reversals. December 25th was also the birthday of the lesser known Phoenician sun and fertility god, Baal (who was also represented by a bull). After AD 274/5, the Emperor Aurelian combined the nativity/god-men/savior cult observances of Apollo, Attis, Baal, Dionysus, Helios, Hercules, Horus, Mithra, Osiris, Perseus, and Theseus, into one, the Dies Natilus Invictus Solis (“Birthday of the Unconquered Sun”) celebrated on December 25th and concerned with the death and rebirth of the sun.

Though Christians themselves didn’t begin to celebrate the birth of Christ until between AD 127 and 139, by AD 320, after the last of the Christian persecutions, the Roman Catholic Church had made December 25th the date of its Nativity celebration. Why December 25th? Secular speculation postulates that because the deeply rooted Sol Invictus had not been eradicated by Christianity, the Catholic Church purposefully chose to turn December 25th, the Natilis Invictus (“the birth of the sun”), into “the birth day of the Son,” that is, of Jesus Christ, the son of God. Others would hold that this date was arrived at by a different line of reasoning: the Catholic Church, aware that March 25th, the Spring Equinox, a pagan feast-day, had long been regarded as the “birth of Spring” among pagan peoples, therefore appropriated that date to mark the “Day of Announcement,” the day that the Virgin Mary conceived the Lord Jesus; adding nine months to March 25th made December 25th the birthday of Christ. Either way, in one move, the Church assigned a specific date to the birth of Our Lord that introduced a Christian holiday into the pagan celebrations occurring in December that supplanted the Natilis Invictus.

Emperor Constantine, a pragmatic politician and “Christian,” recognized the need to unify the diverse elements within his realm under the mantle of Christianity. An article entitled, “Sacaea-Saturnalia,” quotes the authors of the book, Holy Blood, Holy Grail, in the following commentary on Constantine,

“His primary, indeed obsessive, objective was unity—unity in politics, in religion, and in territory. A cult or state religion that included all other cults within it obviously helped to achieve that objective…in the interests of unity, Constantine deliberately chose to blur the distinctions among Christianity, Mithraism and Sol Invictus…”

After the Council of Nicea in AD 325 (that body of 250-318 Church leaders convened by Emperor Constantine to set Christian doctrine), Constantine allowed Christianity to effectively become the recognized religion of the Empire. In AD 336 he declared Christmas an official holiday of the Roman Empire, and Roman Catholicism’s “Feast of the Nativity” became the only approved Christmas activity. Even the city of Rome itself was celebrating Christmas by AD 354, Constantinople by 380, and Alexandria by 430. By AD 391 Christianity formally became the state religion; however, in the eastern sections of the Roman Empire Christmas observances weren’t adopted until the middle of the 5th century AD. The Council of Agde, in AD 506, exhorted all Christians to take Holy Communion at the Feast of the Nativity. In AD 529 Emperor Justinian declared Christmas a civic holiday, suspending private and public business activities for that day. By AD 1100 Christmas was the greatest holiday observed in Europe. During the 16th century the Reformation banned much of the excesses of pagan customs which had been incorporated into “Christian” Christmases. (As an interesting footnote on Christmas celebrations, Jan. 6th is the date of the Church of Jerusalem’s observance; and the Eastern Orthodox Church, while holding to the December 25th birth date, has held, since the end of the 4th century AD, that Christ’s baptism on January 6th is the more important holiday. Also, the Armenian Church waited until after WWII to adopt the December 25th date.)

The Feast of Epiphany or Appearance (“to show forth upon”), held on January 6th, was established by the Roman Catholic Church in the 4th century AD to separate the celebration of Christ’s birth from the commemoration of his “appearing.” January 6th had earlier been used by the heretical sect, the Basilideans, as a festival of Jesus’ incarnation, His “appearing,” at His baptism (thus denying the incarnation at Jesus’ birth); the Church, therefore, ordained that Christ’s “appearing” was that of His epiphany to the Gentile world, as represented by the Wisemen at Bethlehem. It also declared that the interval between Christmas and Epiphany was a sacred holiday season. (This led to a perpetuation of all the practices and excesses of the Saturnalia.) In medieval times, usually on the Eve of Epiphany, January 5th, masked or costumed cross-dressing merrymakers, “mummers,” visited friends and neighbors to test them as to their identities by singing short songs or dances; in return they would receive small cakes and wine or spiked eggnog. On Twelfth Night itself (Jan. 5th) a special “King’s Cake,” in honor of the Magi, was baked with a secret bean inside; whoever received the piece containing the bean became “Bean King” who could order his “attendants” to serve him.

The Nativity of Christmas is the truest and purest part of the Christmas celebration, a depiction of the birth of Christ. In the Gospel of Luke, the second chapter, we read,

So Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in Judea, to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David. He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child. While they were there, the time came for the baby to be born, and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn. And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night. An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord. This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.” Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men on whom His favor rests” (LUK 2:4-14, NIV).

Luke records the date of this event as follows…

“In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. This was the first census that took place while Quirinius was governor of Syria. And everyone went to his own town to register (LUK 2:1-3, NIV).”

Scholars believe Jesus’ birth took place between 6-4 BC. We know that this event occurred no later than 4 BC because King Herod, who had sought to kill the baby Jesus (MAT 2:1-18), died in March/April of 4 BC. It could probably not have happened earlier than 6 BC because the governor of Syria, Publius Sulpicius Quirinius (LUK 2:2), though ordered to conduct a census of Palestine in 8 BC, did not accomplish that task until 2-4 years later, perhaps because of political conflict between Rome and Herod. (A second census of Palestine was also taken by Quirinius in AD 6-9.) While the readers of the Gospel of Luke would have been able to pinpoint the date, we, however, do not have enough information to determine the actual anniversary. We cannot even ascertain the season of Christ’s birth. The traditional view of the season has always been that our Lord was born sometime in the fall when the sheep were brought down from the high country to the fields near the towns, or perhaps in the spring when the flocks were being moved out of their winter shelters for the upper pasturelands. Recent scholarship, though, has shown that sheep for the Temple sacrifices were pastured all year in the fields surrounding Bethlehem, so the fact that shepherds and sheep were present at the time of Christ’s birth is not helpful in fixing the date. However, in the eternal scheme of things the date of our Lord’s birth is of relatively little significance—what is of importance is the fact that He did, indeed, become flesh as the first-born son of the virgin Mary, born in humble circumstances, wrapped in swaddling and laid to rest in a feeding trough.

According to A Book of Christmas, by William Samsom, all Catholic countries build manger scenes to commemorate the birth of Jesus Christ, from Europe to Africa to North and South America. This practice may stem from the AD 1223 nativity celebration of St. Francis of Assisi, who staged the first “Nativity Scene,” a living nativity with live people and animals. St. Bonaventure, writing in the 13th century, described the circumstances of this first Nativity scene:

“That this might not seen an innovation, he [St. Francis] sought and obtained license from the supreme pontiff, and they made ready a manger, and bale hay, together with an ox and an ass, he brought unto the place…The man of God (St. Francis) filled with tender love, stood before the manger, bathed in tears, and overflowing with joy. Solemn masses were celebrated over the manger, Francis the Levite of Christ chanting the Holy Gospel.”

Before that century was over Europe had embraced the nativity crèche and carved nativity sets were available with the figures dressed in contemporary styles. The nativity evolved from there: during the Renaissance the crèche scene was dramatized with landscaped backgrounds, and bystanders, richly bedecked figures and pageantry were added as well. But by the 17th and 18th centuries the trappings of the overwhelmingly ornate spectacle had almost eclipsed the spiritual significance of the event. However, the Christmas nativity is still popular among Christians today; many churchyards and private homes display static manger scenes with figures ranging from lifelike plaster or plastic sculptures to mere silhouettes outlined in lights. Inside church and home can usually be found scaled down sets as well, some extremely elaborate and complete and some consisting of just the holy family and a stable. The “Living Nativity,” a silent drama about the birth of Christ and the salvation message, is becoming an accepted means of evangelization among Protestant American churches to broadcast the true meaning of Christmas to the unsaved world.

Christmas plays are an offshoot of the static nativity; these seem to date to the 12th century at the cathedral at Rouen. There, an image of the Virgin and Child was placed behind an altar in a stable, a boy played the part of the herald angel and others the heavenly host, a choir portrayed the shepherds, and two priests (representing women) took the roles of prompts and narrators to explain the significance of the advent. (Curiously, on Christmas Eve, Dec. 24th, apart from the Church, medieval minstrels always performed the “Paradise Play,” a drama which reenacted the fall of man.)

Christmas Feasting is that time of warm fellowship and enjoyment afforded by Christmas cooking and especially, the Christmas table. What do we think of when we envision the groaning abundance of appetizing and delicious foods? Well, George Washington once hosted a Christmas dinner at Mount Vernon that featured onion soup, shellfish, broiled fish, roast beef and Yorkshire pudding, mutton chops, roast suckling pig, roast turkey, beef and ham, lima beans and squash, candied sweet potatoes and cranberries, mincemeat pie, various savory pies and puddings, cakes, ice cream, fruits, nuts, raisins, and wines. However, Christmas feasting is older than colonial America—it’s a more ancient practice, carried out by many cultures. The origins Christmas feasts may be traced directly to the practices of paganism.

When the Romans observed the Saturnalia, the festival of Saturn, on about December 17th, it was characterized by unrestrained feasting on the fruits of the harvest (grains, fruit, nuts, wine, etc.). On December 25th, as they observed the “Birthday of the Unconquered Sun,” they dined on sacrificial beef. At Kalends, the New Year celebration, they gorged themselves on apples, nuts, honey, cakes, breads, meat and wine. Baal worshippers celebrated the birth of their god with a feast of slaughtered bullocks. Egyptians feasted at Horus’ birthday celebration. At the winter solstice pre-Christian Norsemen feasted on boar offered to their Norse god, Freya. From about the 4th century, early Christians celebrated the Feast of Epiphany on January 6th; later, after the last persecution (AD 320) the Roman Church set another holy feast day, the “Feast of the Nativity,” on the 25th of December. The extent of feasting grew until the peak of nativity feasting occurred between the 12th-16th centuries, and it was a time of indulgent excess in gluttony, drunkenness, and lawlessness. However, in the 17th and 18th centuries, under the influence of the Protestant Reformation, Christmas feasts assumed more modest proportions.

Most of the foods we think of as the traditional European Christmas feast—the boar’s head, “baron of beef,” haunch of venison, fish, fowl (including chicken, turkey, goose, peacock), plum pottage or plum broth (which became mincemeat pie), plum pudding, special breads, and free-flowing wines, can be traced to pagan repasts. In the medieval period many forbidden “pagan” dishes made their way to the table “sanctified” for holy celebrating. For example, Henry VIII reintroduced previously “pagan” roast boar to the Christmas feast by dressing it in a rosemary and laurel wreath for “remembrance” and “glory,” with a lemon in its mouth as a symbol of plenty. Mincemeat, with its savory mixture of nuts and fruits, once regarded as a pagan dish, became, in medieval times, became a symbol of the variety of gifts given to Jesus by the wise men. Christmas breads, an integral part of heathen expressions of worship toward the gods of harvest, were transformed into the “bread of life,” complete with a letter “J” on top.

Generally, today’s lavish meals are served on Christmas Day, though some prefer a Christmas Eve celebration. The most popular meal in the United States of America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand is turkey, with all the fixings. (Henry VIII gets credit for making turkey a Christmas dish.) In the British Isles it is normal to serve roast goose. Austrians and Norwegians sup on baked carp and lutefish (dried cod) respectively; other cultures preserve their own particular preferences. Vegetables and other dishes always accompany the main course. Many cultures also maintain the custom of Christmas baking. The four Sundays of Advent see baked goods like babkas, sugary loaves, yeast buns and fruit-packed loaves proliferate. Baked goods like German Stollen (a rich bread filled with dried fruits and nuts), Springerle (a rolled cookie), Lebkuchen (honey cakes), Danish Kringle (an Advent loaf in the shape of a pretzel), French Buche de Noel or “Christmas Log” (a loaf shaped like a Yule Log), Panettone (an Italian Christmas bread filled with raisins and lemon flavor), English “figgy pudding” (a dark fruit cake), and Spanish Roscon de Reyes or “Three King’s Bread” (a sweet yeast bread filled with candied fruits and almonds), to name a few, demonstrate the international continuance of this tradition.

After the feast Americans like to eat pumpkin pie, mince pie and fruitcakes. In the British Isles and Canada the customary dessert is plum pudding. Mexico and other Latin-American countries serve pastries called bunuelos, usually eaten with cinnamon and sugar.

A popular Christmas beverage in the U.S. today is eggnog; Swedes traditionally drink glogg, a hot, spicy, alcoholic punch. In Olde England wassail the drink of choice and this is still a favorite with the British; ancient Norse drank mead, a fermented brew of water, honey, malt, spices and raisins.

Gift Giving is a tradition that finds its origin in ancient customs as well. The Romans gave gifts of small candles, lamps, fruit, cakes, incense and clay figures at Saturnalia; at Kalends, the day of the new moon and the first day of the month and the New Year, everyone gave each other sweet gifts (fruits, honey and cakes) as well as evergreen branches (called strenae), clay doll-figures (called sigillaria, these replaced human sacrifices), small lamps, and among the wealthy, possibly gold coins. Meg Crager, author of The Whole Christmas Catalog, wrote of this period, “Everyone gave gifts: children gave to their teachers, slaves gave to their masters, and the people gave to their Emperor.”

Early Christians did not practice gift giving because they did not want their religion to be associated with pagan festivals or practices. The Middle Ages mark the point at which gift-giving became a part of Christian Christmas celebrations: kings demanded gifts from their subjects and common people exchanged gifts with one another. St. Nicholas’s Day (Dec. 6th) became gift-giving time for children. Christmas gifts were not emphasized in colonial America but children expected small gifts and the wealthy were expected to give to the poor: Christmas was regarded to be more a time of joy than of gift giving. In the 19th century the Christmas-gift custom became widespread in America, accepted by both children and adults. Today the Christmas season is characterized by lavish gift giving. Individual households expend thousands of dollars each year on tokens of love, making Christmas the major retail sales season of the year. 1999 saw shoppers lay down a staggering $186 billion dollars for gifts. More than ever, Christmas shoppers are tempted by advertisers and retailers to spend ever more on this and that expensive Christmas “must-have” item. And marketing is pushing “Christmas” earlier than ever; this year, 2000, is the first when retailers have displayed Christmas merchandise before Halloween. Neiman Marcus stores began to sell Christmas decorations in the middle of September. While 1999 brought in a 7.3% increase over the previous year’s sales, retailers are anxiously anticipating an uncertain buying season ahead, so they are starting earlier and pushing harder. It seems greed, not “goodwill toward man,” has become the motivation of the season.

Christmas lights may be traced to the ancient practice of lighting Christmas candles and fires. Ancient Norse kept bonfires blazing during the Yule season; Romans fastened candles to trees during the Saturnalia as symbols of the sun’s return to the earth. Throughout that celebration they also kept lamps burning in their homes to ward off evil spirits, and candles burning in their windows to call back the sun. At Kalends they lit candles to symbolize enlightenment for the new year. The Jews also employed candles in their December celebration of Hanukkah, “The Feast of Lights.” As early as AD 492, a day for candles, “Candlemas Day” (40 days after Christmas), was established as a memorial to the time when Jesus was presented in the Temple as “a light to bring revelation to the Gentiles…” (LUK 2:32). In the Middle Ages, both in churches and homes, it was the custom to set up and light one large candle on Christmas Eve in remembrance of the Star of Bethlehem, which announced the coming of the true light (John 1:9). Some allowed the flame only to burn until sunrise, when it was to be extinguished by the father or oldest member of the household; others let the flame burn through Twelfth Night (Jan. 6th), encompassing the entire Christmas season. Martin Luther is credited with inaugurating the tradition of lights on Christmas trees when he placed lit candles in the branches of his tree. Since that time candles, and their electric counterparts, have adorned trees, windowsills, mantles and eaves as a testimony to Him who is “a light to the Gentiles” (LUK 2:32) and the “light of the world” (JOH 8:12).

Christmas Greens like mistletoe, holly, and ivy decorate homes and public places at Christmas. These are also ancient customs stemming from folk traditions and mythology. Winter was a fearful time for the ancient pagans. The nights were dark and cold and evil spirits were thought to be especially active at Christmas time. The evergreens of mistletoe and holly, thought to be magical, were used to combat these forces of evil. Mistletoe, a Celtic word meaning “all-heal,” was the sacred plant of the Druids, the priests of the Celts, because it grew on sacred oak trees. It was used in their sacrifices to their gods and was also believed to cure diseases and infertility, to render poisons harmless, to protect homes from evil spirits and to bring good luck. The ancient Greeks regarded mistletoe as a charm against evil; Virgil called it the “Golden Bough” whose branches enabled Aeneas to descend into hell and return without harm. The practice of kissing beneath a sprig of mistletoe comes from a Norse myth: Frigga, one of the gods, gave her son, Balder, a charm of mistletoe to protect him from the elements; another god used an arrow made of mistletoe to kill Balder. Frigga then cried tears of white berries to bring her son back to life, and vowed to kiss anyone who rested beneath the plant. Druid priests, who worshiped Baldar, cut the mistletoe from its tree with a golden sickle and distributed it to their people with the words, “All heal.” The people would then hang it over a doorway or in a room to offer the blessing of Frigga to others. Vikings hung it outside their homes as a sign of peace and as a symbol of welcome to visitors. Kissing under a branch of mistletoe was seen as a pledge of friendship. Victorians, ever the romantics and enamored with the concept of a “magical” kiss, expanded the Frigga/Baldar legend to allow unmarried males to steal kisses from unattached females found beneath the mistletoe. Some modern Europeans, though, still practice the custom of kissing beneath the branches of mistletoe to receive from Frigga the blessings of life, fertility, peace and freedom from disease that she promised.

Holly was also believed to have magical powers and to drive demons away. The Romans used it in their processions at the Saturnalia. Primitive tribes believed that holly was attractive to friendly spirits, so they hung it inside their homes and over their doorways, especially at Yuletide. To ward off witches and to ensure protection against severe weather, thunder and lightning, they planted it near their homes. In Olde England unmarried women were told to tie a sprig of holly to their beds to guard them from evil spirits and witches, especially on Christmas Eve. Celtic women put sprigs of holly in their hair when they went out to watch their priests, the Druids, cut the sacred mistletoe from sacred oak trees. Germans considered holly to be a good luck charm against nature. Because of its sharp thorns and blood-red berries most Christians thought it symbolized the crown of thorns. Ivy was the ancient symbol of Bacchus, the Roman god of wine and revelry; it was used in pagan festivals. Once it was banned from the interiors of Christian homes (where the decorations told of Christ’s Advent) and was only used to decorate exteriors. There its feeble appearance reminded some of man’s feebleness and need to “cling” to God’s strength; thus as a symbol of mortality it became an acceptable part of Christian celebrations.

Other Christmas foliage: Laurel or bay evergreens were thought to be emblems of triumph, and thus fitting symbols for the Christ who came to triumph over sin and death. In England, the common cherry laurel or box is sometimes substituted when true laurel cannot be found. Yew was regarded as a symbol of death, yet as a durable cut evergreen was used to symbolize eternal life as well. Rosemary, purple and scented, once thought to be extremely offensive to evil spirits, was the most prized of Christmas decorations until mid-nineteenth century, “for remembrance.” Fir, with its sweet fragrance, was used as a natural incense to honor the newborn Deity. In northern and central Europe it is customary at the beginning of Advent (the period including four Sundays before Christmas) to bring a branch of a cherry tree indoors where warmth and water will make it bloom at Christmas time and bring good luck. Christmas flowers are a symbol of joy in midwinter, thought to honor Christ’s birth. The Christmas Rose, or Snow or Winter Rose, is a plant whose beautiful pink blossoms appear in midwinter in Central Europe. North Americans have used the South American shrub, the Flower of the Holy Night, or Poinsettia plant, as a decoration at Christmas time since its introduction to America in 1828, by Joel R. Poinsett.

Christmas tree decorating is symbolic of the Christmas season to people in North America, Germany and parts of Europe. The modern practice stems from Germany; the first historical mention of this practice comes from Strasburg, Germany, in 1605. Germans decorated their trees with dolls, sweets, apples and wafers, gold foil, and paper roses. The first wave of German immigrants in the 1700s brought the custom of the Christmas tree to America; they decorated their trees with animal cookies, apples, strings of popcorn and brightly colored paper. Hessians, the German mercenaries of the American Revolutionary War, decorated Christmas trees. Some German sects, such as the Moravians, put lighted candles in the branches of their trees (and later in their windows) as early as 1752. Christmas trees appeared in Cambridge, Philadelphia, Rochester, Richmond, Wooster, and Cleveland between 1832 and 1851. From America the custom spread to England; by 1841 Prince Albert used a tree at Windsor, decorated with candles, sweets, fruit and gingerbread, as an official symbol of the season. By the 1890’s manufacturers were producing ornaments in Germany for American and European trees. By the early part of the twentieth century, after the invention of the electric bulb, community trees appeared all over North America illuminated for days on end.

The custom of Christmas trees may find its origins in paganism. Pagans used evergreens and tree decoration during the winter. The Vikings of northern Europe saw evergreens as the symbol of hope that Spring would return after the cold, dark winter; Druids (England, France) decorated oak trees with fruit and candles to honor their gods of harvest and light. Romans decorated trees with trinkets and candles during Saturnalia, the midwinter harvest festival and revelry of Mithras, the Persian god of light and truth.

Legends surround the Christmas-tree custom. One legend says that St. Boniface, an English monk who organized Germany’s and France’s Churches, stopped a pagan human sacrifice by slamming his fist into the sacrificial sacred oak tree and felling it with that blow; in its place grew a tiny fir, which he said was the Tree of Life representing eternal life in Christ. Another says that Martin Luther, founder of the Reformation, was walking through the woods one clear and cold Christmas Eve when the starlight glimmering through the trees awed him so much that he wanted to recreate the sight for his family: so he cut down a small tree, took it home and put candles in its branches to imitate the forest. A third, more fanciful tale concerns a poor woodsman who encountered a lost and hungry child in the woods one Christmas Eve. He gave the child food and shelter for the night; in the morning he found a beautiful glittering tree outside his door as a reward from the disguised Christ Child for his kindness.

Christmas trees may also be dated to the Medieval Ages when decorated trees were used in plays with Biblical themes that were performed all over Europe. In the “Paradise Play,” performed on December 24th, an apple tree was a necessary prop in the fall of man, but winter apple trees were bare so evergreen trees were hung with apples instead.

The Twelve Days of Christmas, or “Christmastide,” is an ancient European, but mostly English, tradition of Christmas celebration. The ancient festival began Dec. 17th and ended as late as Jan. 17th. After the Council of Tours (AD 567) declared the twelve days between Christmas and Epiphany (Jan. 6th) to be sacred, a more modern festival took place, ending with “Twelfthnight,” the Feast of Epiphany on January 6th. It was celebrated with great enthusiasm with a mixture of pagan and holy practices. The celebration of feasting, merrymaking and gift exchanging mirrored the Roman festivals of Saturnalia-Kalendae. There was a Festival of Fools, led by a Lord of Misrule, where masters served servants, sexes exchanged dress, all wore disguises, and even boy bishops presided in churches (until the Reformation.) There were pagan horn-dances and bull dances (to honor fairies and Celtic horned gods); the decorating of houses with mistletoe, holly, rosemary, and evergreens; the lighting of tapers and fires to celebrate the sun; clay dolls given as gifts and boughs cut to honor the goddess Strenia; wassailing of apple trees; feasting on fresh goose, turkey, hog, wine, mincemeat, plumb porridge, apples and wassail; and times of gorging and relaxation. Puritan Cotton Mather described it in 1712 as,

“[T]he feast of Christ’s Nativity is spent in Reveling, Dicing, Carding, Masking, and in Licentious Liberty…by Mad Mirth, by long Eating, by hard Drinking, by lewd Gaming, by rude Reveling…”

Though Christian commemorations were interspersed within the Christmas season—Mass was held on Christmas Eve, Christmas Day feasting commemorated the birth of Christ, the feast of St. Stephen’s Day on Dec. 26th honored the poor, and the Feast of Epiphany on Jan. 6th –the original style of Christmastide celebrations remained basically untouched for 400 years, until a calendar change in 1752 moved the festival to a date eleven days earlier. Under Protestantism many of the overtly pagan traditions, called “Fooltide,” were done away with and Christmastide was shortened to twelve more somber days. However, emotionalism rose again in the nineteenth century, influenced by the writings of Charles Loring Brace and Charles Dickens, and the “goodwill” of Christmas, which had marked the Saturnalia celebrations, became prominent. At that time also, Christmas trees and Christmas “decking” were embraced as necessary and recognized parts of the observance.

Noel (“Nowel,” OFr.) is a term dating from the Middle Ages, associated with the New Year festival, meaning “new birth.” Webster’s Dictionary traces the word to the French noel, from the Latin natalis, “pertaining to birth, a birthday.” The term carried pagan expectations of a new year’s birth when Chaucer wrote of Christmastide,

Janus sits by the fire with a double beard
And drinketh of his bugle horn the wine:
Before him stands the brawn of tusked swine,
And ‘Nowel’ cryeth every lusty man.

Paganism was deeply intertwined in the Christmastide celebrations as Chaucer noted: Janus is a Roman god, the “tusked swine” is a sacrificial boar’s head, and “Nowel” is the cry of “every lusty man” in solstice carousal. However, according to Webster’s the term “noel” came to be, “an expression of joy used in Christmas carols” (which did not become vehicles of holy thought until the 13th century).

Advent on the Church calendar, is the four Sundays prior to Christmas. It is a period dedicated to contemplation of Christ’s “Advent,” or Christ’s Incarnation and Second Coming. The first week is for meditating upon Christ’s flesh, or humanness; the second, the Holy Spirit; the third, death; and the fourth, Christ’s judgment of the dead. The Advent Wreath of Northern Europe, with five candles which symbolize the four Sundays of Advent, made of evergreen boughs trimmed with pinecones, ribbons, sprigs of holly and mistletoe, and artificial snow. Advent Wreaths date from the fourth century, the time when the church began to celebrate the “Advent,” or Christ’s coming to earth as the babe in the manger. The corresponding Advent Season was regarded to be the time to reflect upon His coming and to search one’s heart, repent and rededicate oneself. In the Christmas tradition, the Advent Wreath’s candles are lit in each successive week of the Advent Season in anticipation of the coming Light of the World. The Wreath’s three outer candles are lit on the first three Sundays of December (to symbolize “the penitent heart’s yearning for Christ’s coming); the large central candle is lit on the Sunday prior to Christmas Day to symbolize the “incarnation of perfect God in man;” the colored candle on the wreath is lit on Christmas to celebrate the anticipated Second Coming of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Sometimes ribbons of blue, purple and white and a vine of thorns are woven into the wreath as “threads to remind us of God’s mysterious and gracious plan” of Christ’s suffering, our repentance, and God’s victory over sin.

The origin of the Advent Wreath seems to be with the German Lutherans, perhaps inspired by the Swedish Crown of Lights, a crown of evergreen boughs and four candles worn by young Swedish girls on December 13th, St. Lucia’s Day. St. Lucia was reputedly a young Christian woman who gave her entire dowry to feed the poor; she arrived with a shipload of food to feed the hungry and poor in Sweden. She suffered martyrdom for her beliefs and the crown of lights symbolizes her halo. In Sweden, on December 13th, the oldest Swedish daughter, wearing a white dress and crown of candles, brings a breakfast of saffron buns and coffee to her parent’s room to commemorate St. Lucia.

The Advent Calendar is a cardboard device, like a house, with windows, which may be opened each day of the Advent weeks to reveal an appropriate Scripture verse or toy to emphasize the importance of Christ’s Advent.

Candy Canes, candies in the shape of a shepherd’s crook, have been long associated with Christmas. There is a legend which dates to 1670 which says that the choirmaster of Cologne Cathedral had specially crook-bent sugar sticks made to hand out among his young singers to quiet them during the Living Crèche ceremony. Later, another legend has it, August Imgard of Wooster, Ohio, a German-Swedish immigrant, used candy canes to decorate a small blue spruce tree in 1847. At the turn of the twentieth century hand-made mint flavored, red and white striped candy canes became the norm. In the 1920s a candy maker named Bob McCormack began making striped, peppermint flavored Christmas treats by hand for his children, friends and local shopkeepers in Albany, Georgia. In the 1950s Gregory Keller, Bob McCormack’s brother-in-law, invented a machine that automated candy cane production and made Bob McCormack’s candies accessible to the world at large.

A charming legend associated with the candies is one, which says that candy canes were the creation of a candy maker who longed to glorify Christ. The story goes that he wanted his candy to be a witness to Him, so he chose a hard candy to remind people that Christ is the Rock of all Ages; he shaped it in a “J” for Jesus (or upside down as a crook to represent the Great Shepherd); he made it white to symbolize the purity of Christ; he added a red stripe to represent the blood of Christ shed for sinners and three smaller red stripes to symbolize the stripes He bore from His scourging (sometimes a green stripe is added as a reminder that Christ is a gift from God); peppermint, a flavor similar to hyssop, was chosen as the flavor of the cane to remind the world that Christ sacrificed Himself and purified sinners by His body. The message of salvation was thus incorporated into the sweets concocted by that pious candy maker; every time we eat those canes at Christmas we can be reminded that Jesus Christ is the sweet gift of salvation from God.

The Yule Log is a custom brought to America from England. It is a large stump, root, or part of a tree used as the foundation for a ceremonial Christmas-Eve fire. The word “yule” most likely comes from jul, an old Norse word associated with a twelve day feast at the end of December. Some scholars believe it stems from the old Germanic word Iol (Iul, Giul, etc.), meaning a turning wheel; this then would refer to the rising of the sun-wheel after the winter solstice. Another guess is that it is derived from the Anglo-Saxon word geol (feast), which would then refer to the pre-Christian month long feast of geola (feast-month) held to celebrate the December solstice. Yuletide is the season of the Yule. The ancient Yule season lasted for weeks, sometimes until the frozen ground thawed. Among ancient Teutons and Norse Yule was celebrated the night before the winter solstice with a feast of roast boar. The tradition of burning the Yule log originated among the Germanic tribes as a pagan celebration of Thor, the god of the Yule (who chased away frosts and commanded gentle winds and spring rains to come to bless mankind). For this celebration each family chose the largest tree in the forest they could find to be burned as a symbol of the victory of light over the darkness of winter and over evil spirits. The wood was carried into the house with great ceremony; the master of the home placed it on the hearth and sprinkled it with libations of oil, salt and mulled wine, while prayers were said over it. Its fire was not to go out lest some evil should befall the home. It was believed that the burning log magically made the sun burn brighter. This superstition extended to ancient Christians who chose a stump, root or entire tree for their Yule log, preferably of ash, and ignited it on Christmas Eve by a faggot from the previous year’s log; they kept it burning for a minimum of twelve hours to insure good luck. Some modern Europeans still light the Yule log on Christmas Eve and keep it burning until Epiphany, Jan. 6th, then select a new log on Candlemas (40 days after Christmas) to be burned the following winter. Some follow the custom of retaining bits of the burned log or ashes from its remains to rekindle the next year’s fire, thus ensuring good luck (according to ancient lore it would charm against lightning [Thor’s weapon] and against chilblains during that winter.) Modern descendants of the Vikings in the Shetland Islands burn a thirty-foot long Viking ship at the Up-Helly-Aa (“end of the holiday”) celebration towards the end of January.

“Wassail” refers to a drink of warm ale or spiced cider, which contained sugar eggs, nutmeg, cloves and ginger, and roasted apples. The concoction was also called “lamb’s wool” and “old man’s beard” because of its smoothness and softness. It was the beverage imbibed on the Twelfth Night of Christmas. “Wassailing” was to drink to the health of someone. Custom called for a bowl of wassail to be kept steaming throughout the Christmas season; someone would offer a toast of the drink saying, “Wassail” (be whole) and another would reply, “Drinkhail” (your health). In some parts of England “wassailing” came to refer to a party at which carols were sung and wassail was drunk, or to the practice of traveling from house to house with a bowl of wassail decorated with ribbons, garlands (and sometimes a golden apple), caroling, giving blessings and a drink of wassail in exchange for some small gift of money or food. The following is an except from a famous carol…

Here we come a’wassailing among the leaves of green
Here we come a wand’ring so fair to be seen.

Love and joy come to you, and to you your wassail too.

And God bless you and send you a happy New Year
And God send you a happy New Year…

In ancient usage, “wassail” is derived from the Anglo-Saxon wes hal, “be whole;” at old Twelfth Night Eve (Jan 17th) the ancient practice called for cider and cider-soaked toast to be thrown on the branches of apple trees while invocations to the gods of trees and fruit were sung to insure “good health” and a good crop for the coming year. The oldest ritual was conducted on Old Christmas morning with a procession of carolers or mummers traveling from orchard to orchard and to the major trees in each orchard; incantations were said; great noises were made by the blowing of a bullhorn, the firing of a gun or shouting; libations on the trunk, roots and branches of the trees were poured out; and dancing around the trees was done to ensure future blessings.

Bell ringing: traditionally, late on Christmas Eve church bells are rung to announce the call to Christmas Mass, a practice which is fading. However, the custom can be traced to antiquity when loud noises were habitually used to frighten away evil spirits. Interestingly, in medieval Ireland, Scotland and England, during the hour prior to midnight on Christmas Eve a continuous mournful tolling of bells marked “the devil’s funeral,” (for it was thought that he died when Christ was born); at midnight the bells rang a joyous clamor to mark the birth of the One who broke the power of Satan and death, Jesus Christ.

“Boxing Day,” the day after Christmas, December 26th (also known as the Feast of Stephen), comes from medieval times when priests were supposed to empty their alms boxes and distribute gifts among the poor; also the left-over feasts of the wealthy were “boxed” and given to their servants. In Victorian England, Boxing Day was very popular, and in England, Australia and Canada Boxing Day is still the date on which gifts are given to tradesmen, servants and friends.

Christmas “carols” come from the Greek word choraulein (choros, the dance and aulein, to play the flute); in France and England it meant a ring dance accompanied by singing. Gradually the meaning of the word “carol” came to be of a simple, joyful or playful song, though dancing to the accompaniment of singing was popular through the 14th and 15th centuries in Europe and in England through the Reformation (in Spain even longer). From AD 400-1200 Latin hymns were composed that dwelt on the supernatural aspects of Christmas, but the first true joyful carol, as we know it, is attributed to St. Francis of Assisi in the 13th century (though it too was only written in Latin). The first Franciscan friars, following St. Francis’ lead, composed joyful carols in Italian and these spread to Spain and France and then to the rest of Europe. Here is one a translation of one of those 13th century carols,

In Bethlehem is born the Holy Child,
On hay and straw in the winter wild;
O, my heart is full of mirth
At Jesus’ birth.

By the 14th and 15th centuries carols were exceptionally popular in Europe, when minstrels traveled from castle to castle with both secular and sacred carols; by the 16th century carols were associated with songs of joy sung at Christmas. Their popularity waned, however, in the first part of the 19th century but revived through the publication of old and new carols and caroling festivals at Truro, Cornwall, in 1880 and at King’s College, Cambridge in 1918. Those who caroled from house to house were called “waits.” (Originally “waits” were minstrels of the king’s court who were responsible for calling out the hours as they kept watch.)

Christmas Cards are a modern addition to Christmas. They were developed in England in the 19th century. In 1843, 1,000 copies were made of a card bearing this inscription, “A Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to You.” The first American Christmas card dates from the mid 19th century from Albany, New York, which read, “Christmas Greetings from Pease’s Great Variety Store in the Temple of Fancy.” However, Louis Prang of Boston, Mass., is credited with introducing the cards into American mainstream life in 1875. His designs included the Nativity, the visit of Santa Claus, children, young women, flowers, birds, and butterflies. These cards were relatively expensive so primarily the wealthy sent cards at first; however, around 1890, inexpensive cards from Germany made the practice accessible to all classes.

Santa Claus is, in our modern world, a major focus of the holiday season. His roots can be traced back to a man named Nicholas, Bishop of Myra, who lived in the end of the 3rd century and the early part of the 4th century AD in Patara, Lycinia (modern Turkey). Though he was a historic figure, he is shrouded in myth. The factual information we have about him is that Nicholas was born in AD 271 to a wealthy Christian couple whose names were Epiphaneos and Nona. When Nicholas was a young teenager, an epidemic struck Patara and both Epiphaneos and Nona were killed; Nicholas went to live with his uncle, Nicholas, who was Father Superior of a monastery in Xanthos, a town seven miles upriver from Patara. Disposing of his worldly goods, he joined the monastery. He studied for the priesthood and, after his uncle’s departure for a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, became the priest of Patara. Sometime after his own pilgrimage to Jerusalem he became the Archbishop of Myra, the capital of Lycia. According to Greek Orthodox tradition, he was a defender of orthodoxy, imprisoned during the persecution of Diocletian and freed under Constantine’s general amnesty. In AD 325 he was one of the church leaders to attend the Council of Nicea. He died of natural causes in his old age on December 6th, AD 342 or 343, and was buried in his cathedral in Myra. In 1087, his bones were transferred to Bari, Italy, after Myra fell to the Moslems.

By the time of Justinian, in the sixth century, he was considered a “Saint” and his feast day was celebrated in Myra; his image appeared on Byzantine seals and artists painted him as a miraculous benefactor; by the 8th century invading Normans had spread tales of his gift giving and “miracles” throughout Scandinavia as they encountered the Roman Empire; by the 9th century he was canonized by the Catholic Church. His feast day, December the 6th, St. Nicholas’s Day, was celebrated all over Europe by the 12th century. During the Middle Ages four hundred churches were dedicated to him just in England. The Russians adopted St. Nicholas as their patron saint; the Greeks thought of him as the patron saint of sailors; the French thought of him as the patron saint of lawyers; Belgians thought of him as the helper of children and travelers.

His legend concerns his piety, benevolence and miracle working power. Legend says when he was born he stood up in his bath with his arms upraised; as a nursing babe he would refuse to suck after sundown on Wednesdays and Fridays (the fast days of early Christians). He was said to have disposed of his wealth by anonymously distributing it to the poor. One story has him taking some gold and secretly giving it to the three dowry-less daughters of a destitute nobleman. He is supposed to have tossed a small bag of gold through an open window for the first daughter, where it fell in either her shoe or stocking (this act may be the origin of the custom of hanging up stockings or putting out shoes for gifts). The next night (or occasion) he brought gold for the second daughter in the same way. The third night (or occasion) he brought gold for the third daughter in the same way, but as he left, he was chased and caught by the girl’s father. Nicholas asked that his philanthropy be kept anonymous, but it was not; he became known as the author of secret acts of generosity. Another story, set when he was Bishop, concerned a ship he appeared to and rescued during a raging storm in answer to prayer. He also was said to have brought back from three dead three boys who had been killed and pickled for food; he was supposed to have successfully prayed that the empty holds of merchant ships would be filled with grain during their trip from Myra to Alexandria as a reward for their acts of kindness. He was reputed to have saved his town from starvation. After his death, his tomb was believed to have exuded a “curative” fluid, the “Manna of Nicholas,” that was said to work miraculous healings; and so on, as chronicled by his biographers. He is especially associated with children in the mind of the world.

(How are we to regard these “miracles” attributed to St. Nicholas? Were they real? In 1968, when the Catholic Church reformed its calendar, St. Nicholas’s Day was dropped because it was felt that his reputation was fraudulent, being based on legend more than on historical fact. The Dominican friars who care for his tomb in Bari would like to see him reinstated and are confident that they can find hard evidence of his miracles, but this has not happened yet. But if these “miracles” were truly fraudulent, why did his reputation exist? If they were the work of supernatural forces how did they happen? Did God work those miracles? Can Satan work miracles too? Does Satan work his miracles to deceive people?

First of all, Nicholas lived in the 3rd and 4th centuries, long after the age when godly men were doing attesting miracles. The great miraculous healings of the New Testament tapered off in the first century AD. We see this in 1TI 5:23: here, Paul writes to Timothy in c. AD 63-65 that he should begin taking some medicinal wine for a stomach disorder. If miracles were still in effect why didn’t Paul, who had worked miracles, just send a handkerchief to heal Timothy as was done in Acts 19:12? The answer is that miracles, which attested to the authenticity of revelations from God, ended as the Scriptures were being recorded; there were no new Scriptures written past the first century AD, so no attesting miracles were needed. Another point is that, “godly men do the works of God” (JOH 9:32,33). Bishop Nicholas was known to have been a brawler: he lost his temper and punched another bishop (Arias?) over a disagreement of doctrine at the Council of Nicaea in AD 325 (this council was convened by Constantine to settle the Arian controversy), and was subsequently censured and imprisoned.

Secondly, miracles do not always originate with God. Satan can do miracles. In the book of Job, Satan brings miraculous disasters upon Job, even sickness. In the Gospels, Satan afflicts people with epilepsy, madness, dropsy, crippling. In the book of Revelation, Satan is shown performing many miracles (REV 13:13-15). The book of Matthew says Satan does miracles, “to deceive even the elect, if that were possible” (MAT 24:24). Revelation says that Satan will go out to deceive the nations (REV 20:8.). He is called “the Devil” [slanderer] and “Satan” [adversary] who deceives the whole world” (REV 12:9; 2JO 1:7). Why? In the story of our Lord’s temptation in the wilderness prior to his ministry Satan shows his ambition to be worshiped; he offered Jesus the world and all that was in it if He would “fall down and worship me” (MAT 4:9). Satan wants worship and he will steal it through deception if he can get it no other way.)

The legend of St. Nicholas was brought north, not only by returning Norse invaders, but by traders from Spain after Southern Italy and the Netherlands fell into the hands of the Spanish kings of Aragon, in AD 1442. The Medieval Spanish Bishops who came as clerical appointees with these traders wore long cloaks and tall hats (mitres) and carried curled staffs. Coincidentally, the Nordic people had long worshiped a pantheon of gods, one of whom, Odin (Woden, Woten), had similarities to the legendary bishop, St. Nicholas. Odin was the wisest and most knowledgeable of the Norse gods, able to see all that occurred on the earth; he was old with a long gray beard; he wore a cloak and a tall, wide-brimmed hat, and he carried a long spear. With a horde of others he rode a supernatural gray horse across the sky, land, and water during the winter solstice, giving gifts to the poor and bringing children fruits and nuts. Sint Nicolaas or, Sinterklaas, combined the characteristics of Odin with St. Nicholas: he is an old man with a long white (or gray) beard; he wears a red bishop’s dress and cloak and a tall hat, and carries a long, crooked staff; he rides a supernatural white (or gray) horse across sky and rooftop; and he has an assistant, Black Peter (Zwarte Piet), who travels north with him from Spain and accompanies him in his travels across the Northlands. Black Peter may be called “black” because he is St. Nicholas’s Moorish servant, or because he is “sooty” from sliding down chimneys; but in some European countries he is believed to be a devilish creature who is kept in submission by the power of Sinterklaas. He functions as Sinterklaas’s arm of favor or discipline: he slides down chimneys to reward or punish each child from the contents of his sack. Good children receive presents in their shoes or stockings; bad children receive a switch (or coal in Germany). In ancient lore Black Peter would put extremely bad children in his sack and then drown them; later he was said to spirit them off to Spain.

Sinterklass is believed to spend most of the year in Spain compiling a ledger of good and bad deeds about the Dutch children, but he returns north some time in December. In port cities he is believed to arrive by ship two weeks before St. Nicholas’s Eve, December 5th. On St. Nicholas’s Eve, he is expected to ride over the Dutch rooftops on his white horse with Black Peter, giving the good and bad rewards to the children of the North. In the weeks before the 5th of December Dutch children leave hay and carrots out for Sinterklass’s horse in their wooden shoes; in the morning after Sinterklass has called, these have been replaced by presents, such as chocolate letters, colored marzipan shaped like animals or fruit, or chocolate figures of St. Nicholas. For small children December the 6th is even more important than Christmas itself. December 6th became the traditional time for presents to be given to children and to the poor, not only in Holland, but in Belgium, Germany and France as well.

St. Nicholas may have become associated with Christmas first in England. At the end of every year the English celebrated a “Feast of the Fools,” a Saturnalian feast of plenty beginning on St. Nicholas’s Eve. In this riotous twenty-three (23) day celebration, St. Nicholas, the Boy Bishop, and Old Father Christmas (a white bearded figure who rode a horned goat) were the three figureheads of a topsy-turvy festival ending December 28th (where all order was reversed as in the Saturnalia).

In France, Father Christmas (Pere Noel) or Christ Himself brought gifts on the night before Christmas; in Austria and Switzerland the Christ Child brings gifts; some children await the Holy Child, others a beautiful girl angel sent from heaven with gifts. In Finland, on December 21st gifts were once thrown through open windows anonymously, like St. Nicholas’. In Sweden the gift giver is known as Jultomte, in Iceland, as Jola Sveinar, and in Norway and Denmark as the Julenisse (“nisse” being the old form of Nicholas), a tiny elf-like person dressed in red with a pointed cap, roughly translated as “yule goblin.”

The Dutch colonists to the New World brought St. Nicholas to America. They said that St. Nicholas would come as a magical gift giver on either a white horse on December 5th, or in a small wagon on December 24th. The Pennsylvania Germans called the Christmas gift-giver Chriskindlein or Kris Kringle, who brought gifts on Christmas Eve, December 24th.

The American folk-figure of Santa Claus was transformed gradually through a series of articles and poems from an austere Bishop to a jolly elf. Washington Irving, in his comic “Knickerbocker’s History of New York” (1809), described St. Nicholas as “a plump and jolly old Dutchman” who “traveled through the skies in a wagon” (like Thor). Clement Clarke Moore, a professor of Greek and Oriental Literature at the General Theological Seminary in New York, wrote a poem, “A Visit from Saint Nicholas,” in 1822 described him like this:

He had a broad face and a round little belly,
That shook when he laughed, like a bowl full of jelly,
He was chubby and plump, a right jolly old elf…

In 1823 the poem, “A Visit from Saint Nicholas,” was published in the Troy Sentinel. It became immensely popular when it was illustrated by Thomas Nast in the 1860s in Harper’s Illustrated Weekly. It was Thomas Nast who pictured Santa making toys and dolls, spying on children with a spyglass to discover their behavior, filling stockings with toys, decorating a Christmas tree, and flying through the skies on a magic sleigh. This image became popular in Europe, South America and Japan. The book, “A Christmas Carol” by Charles Dickens (1843), added a selfless element to the Christmas celebration—a humanitarian generosity.

Santa grew from these and many other international influences: a German artist gave St. Nicholas the red fur trimmed Weihnachtsmann (the Christmas man) costume; Scandinavia gave him his small stature (so he could fit down chimneys); Russia gave him a flying sleigh and magic reindeer; America, through Nast, gave him his large jolly appearance with white beard and furs, an image that remains today. The 1947 Hollywood movie, “Miracle on 34th Street,” humanized Santa as the man Kris Kringle, but left the role of omnipotent gift-giver the same.

He has become internationally popular as a symbol of charity and generosity, but is it right? An Anglican vicar wrote this,

“Though he appears to be a great giver, he is actually a thief. For he is stealing the true value of Christmas. He directs our attention to selfish glitter, money, and a spirit that comes out of a bottle. His bottomless sack feeds our base emotions and he represents getting rather than giving.”

The Reverend Del A. Fehsenfeld, pastor of the Argentine Baptist Church in Kansas City, Kansas, said this,

“Some people are more interested in teaching their children there is a Santa Claus and an Easter Bunny than in teaching about the Virgin birth and the Resurrection. To teach your children it is a fact that there is a Santa Claus is to lie.”

Consider the myth of Santa Claus: he is all-knowing; someone who knows all the acts of children and supposedly holds them accountable for the wrongs they do; he lives forever; he is a creator of good gifts; he magically flies all over the world visiting all the homes of all the children in a single night; he travels up and down chimneys without aid; he lives in a secret place. Aren’t these the acts of a supernatural person, like God? Doesn’t his folk tale detract from the reality of Christ and the miracle of His birth? And aren’t we guilty of lying and sinning against God when we repeat the tales of Santa Claus to others and propagate his legend?

Evaluating these and other Christmas traditions is essential if we wish to worship God “in spirit and in truth.” We must deliberate about our Christmas traditions; we must prayerfully and carefully sift through the pagan, folk elements of our celebrations and keep only what is “good, acceptable and perfect.” Some Scriptural considerations in examining our traditions are: Are they true and honoring to God (PHI 4:8; 1COR 10:31)? Do they encourage our faith in God and Jesus Christ (1THES 5:11)? Do they somehow honor idols (DEU 5:7)? Are they a “stumbling block” to others (ROM 14:20; 1COR 10:31; MAT 18:7)? Do they feed the desires of the flesh (GAL 5:19-21; 1JOH 2:16)?

In doing this assessment of our traditions we may find, as the Puritans did, that Christmas is altogether too profane and commercial in which to participate. Or, we may find that we can retain the innocent parts of our traditions and in purity of heart observe Christmas as the memorial of the time when Jesus came as the babe in the manger. Certainly the meaning and message of Christmas is untainted by Saturnalia/Yuletide traditions. And whether we choose to celebrate it or not, all of us who name the Name of Christ can take advantage of the fact that Christmas is the time when the whole world wonders about the Nativity: all of us can be witnesses about the incarnation to the lost. All of us can worship and praise the Creator for sending His Son into the world to be the Lamb of God and Savior of the World. All of us can share the message of “peace to men on whom His favor rests” (LUK 2:14 NIV). To those of us who choose to celebrate the holiday let the principle of Romans, chapter 14, be our guide—God is pleased when we seek to glorify Him in what we approve. The Apostle Paul said, “everything that does not come from faith is sin” (ROM 14:23).

Sources:

“An Old-Fashioned Solstice,” www.geocities.com/Athens/Delphi/3217/Solstice.html.

Adkins, Lesley and Adkins, Roy A., Handbook to Life in Ancient Rome, Facts on File, Inc., N.Y., 1994.

“The Christmas Story,” www.7thdaybaptistchurch.org/articles/christmas_story.html.

Coffin, Tristram P., The Book of Christmas Folklore, Seabury Press, N.Y., 1973.

Crager, Meg and Grace, Margaret, The Whole Christmas Catalogue, Courage Books, Philadelphia, 1986.

Crippen, Thomas, Christmas and Christmas Lore, Gale Research Co., Detroit, 1971.

Encarta “98.

Encyclopedia Britannica 1999.

“Feasting,” www.worldbook.com/fun/holidays/html/feast/htm.

Horovitz, Bruce, “Uneasy retailers need a little Christmas – now,” USA TODAY, October 31, 2000.

Hottes, Alfred C., 1001 Christmas Facts and Fancies, A.T. Delamare Co. Inc., N.Y., 1937.

Ickis, Marguerite, The Book of Christmas, Dodd, Mead & Co., N.Y., 1960.

www.mylostbirthday.com/christian/enterprise/pagan-origins.html/.

“Sacaea Saturnalia,” www.candlegrove.com/sacaea.html.

Sansom, William, A Book of Christmas, McGraw-Hill, N. Y., 1968.

“Seasonal Holliday Attire: Christmas in the Netherlands,” www.histclo.hispeed.com/act/holiday/holxmashol.html.

Skarmes, Nancy, The Traditions of Christmas, Ideal Pub. , 1997.

“St. Nicholas of Myra Bishop, Confessor C. 342, Feast: December 6,” www.ewtn.com/library/MARY/NICHOLAS.htm.

“St. Nicholas the Miracleworker,” Orthodox Saints Vol 4, www.home.it.net.au/-jgraosas/pages/st_nicholas.htm.

Stevenson, Rev. Alex, “Why is Christmas in December?” www.christmas eternal/christmas98.com.

“Thor’s Gallery,” www.geocities.com/-jlhagan/thor/thor.htm.

“True Stories About Christmas,” www.yahweh.com/pages/pw1298/christ.shtml.

Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary, Collins World, 1975.

Weiser, Francis X., The Christmas Book, Harcourt, Brace and Company, N.Y., 1952.

Wernecke, Herbert H., Christmas Customs Around the World, Westminster Press.

“Winter Solstice Celebrations: a.k.a. Christmas, Saturnalia, Yule,”

www.religioustolerance.org/winter_solstice.htm.

“Winter Solstice: The Unconquered Sun,” www.shambhala.org/arts/fest/unconquered. Html.

“The Yule Log,” www.culture.fr/culture/noel/angl/buche.html.