Archaeology and History Attest to the Reliability of the Bible
By Richard M. Fales, Ph.D.
No other ancient book is questioned or maligned like the Bible. Critics looking for the flyspeck in the masterpiece allege that there was a long span between the time the events in the New Testament occurred and when they were recorded. They claim another gap exists archaeologically between the earliest copies made and the autographs of the New Testament. In reality, the alleged spaces and socalled gaps exist only in the minds of the critics. Manuscript Evidence. Aristotle’s Ode to Poetics was written between 384 and 322 B.C. The earliest copy of this work dates A.D. 1100, and there are only forty-nine extant manuscripts. The gap between the original writing
and the earliest copy is 1,400 years. There are only seven extant manuscripts of Plato’s Tetralogies, written 427–347 B.C. The earliest copy is A.D. 900—a gap of over 1,200 years. What about the New Testament? Jesus was crucified in A.D. 30. The New Testament was written between A.D. 48 and 95. The oldest manuscripts date to the last quarter of the first century, and the second oldest A.D. 125. This gives us a narrow gap of thirty-five to forty years from the originals written by the apostles. From the early centuries, we have some 5,300 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament. Altogether, including Syriac, Latin, Coptic, and Aramaic, we have a whopping 24,633
texts of the ancient New Testament to confirm the wording of the Scriptures. So the bottom line is, there was no great period between the events of the New Testament and the New Testament writings. Nor is there a great time lapse between the original writings and the oldest copies. With the great body of manuscript evidence, it can be proved, beyond a doubt, that the New Testament says exactly the same things today as it originally did nearly 2,000 years ago. Corroborating Writings. Critics also charge that there are no ancient writings about Jesus outside the New Testament. This is another ridiculous claim. Writings confirming His birth, ministry, death, and resurrection include Flavius Josephus (A.D. 93), the Babylonian Talmud (A.D. 70–200), Pliny the Younger’s letter to the Emperor Trajan (approx. A.D. 100), the Annals of Tacitus (A.D. 115–117), Mara Bar Serapion (sometime after A.D. 73), and Suetonius’ Life of Claudius and Life of Nero (A.D. 120). Another point of contention arises when Bible critics have knowingly or unknowingly misled people by implying that Old and New Testament books were either excluded from or added into the canon of Scripture at
the great ecumenical councils of A.D. 336, 382, 397, and 419. In fact, one result of these gatherings was to confirm the Church’s belief that the books already in the Bible were divinely inspired. Therefore, the Church, at these meetings, neither added to nor took away from the books of the Bible. At that time, the thirty-nine Old Testament books had already been accepted, and the New Testament, as it was written, simply grew up with the ancient Church. Each document, being accepted as it was penned in the first century, was then passed on to Christians of the next century. So, this foolishness about the Roman Emperor Constantine dropping books from the Bible is simply
uneducated rumor. Fulfilled Prophecies. Prophecies from the Old and New Testaments that have been fulfilled also add credibility to the Bible. The Scriptures predicted the rise and fall of great empires like Greece and Rome (Daniel 2:39, 40), and foretold the destruction of cities like Tyre and Sidon (Isaiah 23). Tyre’s demise is recorded by ancient historians, who tell how Alexander the Great lay siege to the city for seven months. King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon had failed in a 13-year attempt to capture the seacoast city and completely destroy its inhabitants. During the siege of 573 B.C., much of the population of Tyre moved to its new island home approximately half a mile from the land city. Here it remained surrounded by walls as high as 150 feet until judgment fell in 332 B.C. with the arrival of Alexander the Great. In the seven-month siege, he fulfilled the remainder of the prophecies (Zechariah 9:4; Ezekiel 26:12) concerning the city at sea by completely destroying Tyre, killing 8,000 of its inhabitants and selling 30,000 of its population into slavery. To reach the island, he scraped up the dust and rubble of the old land city of Tyre, just like the Bible predicted, and cast them into the sea, building a 200-footwide causeway out to the island. Alexander’s death and the murder of his two sons was also foretold in the Scripture. Another startling prophecy was Jesus’ detailed prediction of Jerusalem’s destruction, and the further spreading of the Jewish diaspora throughout the world, which is recorded in Luke 21. In A.D. 70, not only was Jerusalem destroyed by Titus, the future emperor of Rome, but another prediction of Jesus Christ in Matthew 24:1,2 came to pass—the complete
destruction of the temple of God. Messianic Prophecies. In the Book of Daniel, the Bible prophesied the coming of the one and only Jewish Messiah prior to the temple’s
demise. The Old Testament prophets declared He would be born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2) to a virgin (Isaiah 7:14), be betrayed for thirty pieces of silver (Zechariah 11:12,13), die by crucifixion (Psalm 22), and be buried in a rich man’s tomb (Isaiah 53:9). There was only one person who fits all of the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament who lived before A.D. 70: Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of Mary. Yes, the Bible is an amazing book. (Taken from the Evidence Bible)
The Righteous Aren't Always As Bold As A Lion. Lol
10 years ago






2 comments:
I have some comments on why I believe Micah wasn't referring to a messianic prophecy at all.
Micah 5:2 But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days.
I used to believe in these messianic prophecies as well. The following is my comment on why the verse in Micah is not referring to a future messiah, namely Jesus.
Right at the beginning of the Book of Micah, the writing is actually given a historical reference point. It says that Micah prophesied during the reigns of Jothan, Ahaz and Hezekiah…and that his prophesies concerned the situation between the Northern and Southern kingdoms. (We’re talking about the period between, roughly, 720-700 BCE).
And the writer specifies that Micah prophesied about the situation that existed between the Northern and Southern kingdoms, Israel and Judah. In plain English, both kingdoms claimed to be the true heart of Judaism. Micah’s viewpoint is very clear: Judah is the religious repository, and not Israel (1:5-6 “And what are the high places of Judah–are they not Jerusalem? Therefore I will make Samaria a heap in the field.”)
Seven hundred years before Jesus, and discussing the local religious situation. Therefore the “Bethlehem” passage in Micah cannot be referring to a messianic prophecy.
Micah was a prophet in the days of King Hezekiah of Judah. The key moment of his reign was the Assyrian threat on his kingdom when they laid siege to the capital city of Jerusalem. Being a righteous man (according to the biblical writer), Micah apparently comes to the rescue with a “word from the Lord.”
As a prophet, his job was to offer moral support to a righteous king. After all, there was no way God was not going to support and rescue a devout worshiper so it was expected God would send word of encouragement.
Micah believed a hero would come from an ancient family line that went back as far as the early days of Israel’s ascendancy in Canaan. The family name was Bethlehem-Ephrathah, Bethlehem being the great grand descendant of Caleb through is marriage to Ephrathah (See I Chronicles 2:18 and 42-50). Yes, Bethlehem and Ephrathah were actually people and not just the name of Judean towns that apparently came to bear their names. Many people don’t realize this.
They appear to have been a small clan (Micah mentions this) but had a distinction of an ancient lineage (from days of old) and legacy coming through a legendary figure - Caleb. That Micah is definitely not predicting Jesus or anyone beyond his time is made clear in the fifth verse of the chapter where we are given a time-line for this hero’s appearance. He tells us that this “one,” who would restore the peace would step up ‘When the Assyrian comes into our land.’
Jesus cannot qualify because the Assyrians had long ceased to be a people 700 years before the time of Jesus. At no point in Jesus’ life would he have ever met Assyrians nor was there ever an Assyrian invasion of Judea during his time nor are we told there will ever be.
This is why Micah cannot be a messianic prophecy and isn’t referring to Jesus at all.
Micah 5:2 is a well known messianic prophecy. So this not messianic when Micah 5:2 says, "But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah,
out of you will come for me
one who will be ruler over Israel,whose originsare from of old, from ancient times."
The problem why don't it messianic is that you don't know Scripture how could Micah 5:2 make it for you. But the there are [near and far fullfillments.
Footnotes:
Post a Comment